The following is from a book review by Fr. Paul Scalia. The source isThe Adoremus Bulletin - Vol. VI, No. 9: Dec. 2000 - Jan. 2001. Fr. Scaliareviews the book, The Spirit of the Liturgy, by Joseph CardinalRatzinger, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, publishedLast year by Ignatius Press. "The Scandal of the Incarnation" poses a perennial threat to theChurch. This phrase describes the difficulty of accepting the Church's teachingThat God became man. It scandalizes people because they resist the idea thatGod would limit Himself in that way, or stoop to our level at all. TheyReject the particularity of God's descent to earth: that He became aparticular man in a particular place, in a particular time. That God should choose onetime, place, and group over any other strikes them as unfair, undemocratic. The Scandal of the Incarnation finds a parallel in liturgicalControversies surrounding us: the liturgy scandalizes people, too, and for similarreasons. They resist the teaching that the liturgy is limited in someway or that it possesses a definite spirit or form. That there should beparticular demands regarding the time, place, and actions of the liturgy strikesmany people as unfair, undemocratic. They resent the fact that they cannotdo as they please with the liturgy. Thus the Church now suffers from what wemight call "The Scandal of the Liturgy." Ratzinger focuses on the essence of the liturgy to show how the liturgy"takes flesh" in our world. The book is a consideration of theincarnation of worship. The very structure of the Liturgy follows the pattern ofthe Incarnation. Just as the Prologue of St. John's Gospel contemplates theWord "in the beginning," before it becomes flesh, so also Ratzinger looks toThe essence of the liturgy before he considers how it becomes flesh. Ratzinger focuses on the meaning of `rite' and the significance ofBodily gestures such as kneeling and the sign of the cross in expressing theCosmic language of liturgical symbol. He examines regulations of the liturgyIn detail only after looking upwards, to the truth of the liturgy. HeConcerns himself with two basic points throughout the book: first, that theLiturgy possesses a definite form; second, that certain particulars in theLiturgy flow from its very essence. The book focuses on the spirit of the liturgy, that is, what isessential to the very nature of the liturgy. Ratzinger makes it clear that "spirit"in this case means the liturgy's inner demands and form; the "spirit" ofthe liturgy is not one thing today and another thing tomorrow. While theliturgy expresses itself differently throughout history and in differentcultures, its spirit remains the same. But because man is accustomed to manipulate, control and dominate theworld, the suggestion that there exists a definite, objective meaning to theliturgy scandalizes him. He resists the spirit of the liturgy and wouldrather dominate the liturgy to make it fit his own whims and desires.There is an arrogant view that the liturgy is something we create andmanipulate. This view displays an attitude of rebellion and an unwillingness toreceive the true worship that Christ gives us. Ratzinger strikes at the root of our present problems when hevindicates the spirit of the liturgy and states that "man himself cannot simply `make'worship". Proper worship is "received from God in faith." We receivethe liturgy; we do not produce it. This point must precede any discussionof particulars. Before we can discover what constitutes "right worship,"we must first accept that there is such a thing as "right worship." Many, if not most, liturgical writers today take a consequentialistapproach. "We should do this because it will produce that." "Will itwork?" seems to be their first and only question. Ratzinger, on the otherhand, asks whether a particular action, gesture, kind of music or artpertains to the essence of the liturgy. Of course, precisely how the liturgy becomes flesh scandalizes people.They object to the specifics of worship time, place, movement, posture,words. The disagreement is not so much over the specific changes to be made,but over what determines the particulars: Do we decide, or do we let theliturgy speak for itself? Ratzinger does not merely contribute to the debate. He calls attentionTo what the terms of the debate must be: The life of the liturgy does notCome from what dawns upon the minds of individuals and planning groups. OnThe contrary, it is God's descent upon our world, the source of realliberation. Ratzinger observes, "Incarnation does not mean doing as we please." Foryears, many liturgists have separated the liturgy from the Incarnation,precisely so that they may do as they please with it. The Spirit of theLiturgy reasserts the liturgy's utter dependence on the Incarnation. BySo doing, Ratzinger reveals that the Scandal of the Liturgy really has itsroots in the Scandal of the Incarnation. The Scandal of the Incarnation stems from pride. Since God became aparticular man in a particular time and place, we must meet Himaccording to the particulars of His life. We must meet Him on His terms, not ours.The proud resist this, because they want to determine their relationshipWith God. They want to set the terms. They do not want to receive God, butTo possess Him. So also the Scandal of the Liturgy stems from pride. Since the liturgyIs the worship of the Incarnate Word of God, we must abide by the essenceOf His worship. But the "creators" of liturgy do not want to worship inThe form that Christ gave us. They want to determine their own form ofworship. They want to set the terms. Like the builders of the tower of Babel,they want to make a name and a liturgy for themselves. Ultimately, they donot want to receive the liturgy, but to possess it. And just as the remedy for the Scandal of the Incarnation is to receiveThe truth about the Incarnate Word, so also the remedy for the Scandal ofThe Liturgy is to receive its true spirit: The more we humbly surrenderourselves to this descent of God, the more true and personal itbecomes.